久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Talks can silence the drums of trade war

By Yu Yongding | China Daily | Updated: 2018-05-03 07:40
Share
Share - WeChat

Last month, the United States administration fired the opening salvo in what could lead to a full-blown trade war. While trade frictions have long been an issue in China-US relations, few expected such an escalation, not least because economists widely view trade wars as damaging to all parties. So how did we get to this point, and can we turn back before it's too late?

First and foremost, US President Donald Trump does not seem to understand how trade works. He thinks the US' $500 billion trade deficit with China ($337.2 billion in 2017 according to China's calculation) amounts to a loss, the result of "incompetent" US administrations allowing their Chinese counterparts to take advantage of them. In fact, according to Trump, the US already lost a "trade war" with China years ago.

But trade balances are far more complex than what Trump makes them out to be. For starters, much of what China exports includes components manufactured elsewhere, meaning China's trade surplus actually includes the trade surpluses of many other countries.

China's external account is basically balanced

Moreover, China runs large deficits against Japan and Southeast Asian economies, even as it runs a large surplus against the US. China's overall trade surplus as a share of GDP has fallen steadily over the last decade-from nearly 10 percent in 2007 to just above 1 percent in 2017-meaning the country's external account is basically balanced.

And then there is the US' current-account deficit, which is not necessarily a bad thing, as it implies the acquisition of large amounts of foreign capital. This has benefited the US over the years, by strengthening its financial system and currency. While the US external deficit could stand to be reduced, as it partly reflects its own lack of savings, trade policy alone would not be sufficient to achieve that goal.

None of this is to say the US does not have any legitimate grievances about China's trade practices. But those must be viewed as issues of China's compliance with the World Trade Organization rules.

As former WTO director-general Pascal Lamy once acknowledged, while China has done "really well" in implementing its long list of WTO commitments, "no country is above criticism". In particular, Lamy noted, certain services sectors may not be sufficiently open and protection of intellectual property rights should be strengthened.

These are fair criticisms. Indeed, the Chinese government itself hoped to open up the financial-services sectors more quickly, but financial fragility demanded a gradualist approach.

As for the US, its Trade Representative has closely monitored China's WTO compliance since the country joined it in 2001. The USTR's 2016 report on the topic acknowledged the complexity of the picture presented by China's WTO membership at the time, but took an overall positive tone, highlighting the expansion of mutually beneficial trade and investment.

USTR's focus is on wrong aspects

Yet the USTR report for 2017-Trump's first year in office-mentioned no positive results. Instead, asserting that the US had "erred in supporting China's entry into the WTO on terms that have proven to be ineffective in securing China's embrace of an open, market-oriented trade regime", the USTR focused on complaints about Chinese industrial policy, which is largely beyond the WTO's scope.

In particular, the Trump administration has taken issue with the Made in China 2025 plan, introduced by the State Council, China's Cabinet, in 2015 with the aim of boosting 10 strategic industries, including advanced information technology, automated machine tools and robotics, aviation and spaceflight equipment, and electric vehicles. The USTR report warns that the strategy's "final goal" is to "capture much larger worldwide market shares" in the targeted industries.

In reality, the Made in China 2025 plan-which, incidentally, is inspired partly by the US government's own massive investment in research and development-seeks to raise China's manufacturing ability only to the average level of the world's major manufacturing powers by 2035(not 2025), a rather modest goal. But even if China wants to set more ambitious goals, by what right can the US-which has much larger market shares in the targeted industries-block it from attempting to do so?

According to the USTR report, the problem is that the policy tools the Chinese government is using to achieve the goals of Made in China 2025 "are largely unprecedented, as other WTO members do not use them". Besides, they "include a wide array of state intervention and support designed to promote the development of Chinese industry in large part by restricting, taking advantage of, discriminating against, or otherwise creating disadvantages for foreign enterprises and their technologies, products, and services".

Yet the report fails to identify those interventions, which is not surprising, given that the State Council has not yet specified the policy tools it will use. And even if the US' grievances over IPR issues are understandable, they could be addressed through the WTO. The fact that the Trump administration has taken the approach it has suggests it does not merely want to ensure that China complies with existing rules; it also wants to prevent China from catching up to the US technologically. This is obviously not acceptable to China.

Fueling the risk of Thucydides' trap

This reading is reinforced by the National Security Strategy report that the Trump administration issued in December, which asserted that the US would "respond to the growing political, economic, and military competitions we face around the world". China was cited as the main challenger to "American power, influence, and interests", an adversary that is "attempting to erode American security and prosperity". This perspective fuels the risk of the so-called Thucydides' trap, in which an established power's fear of a rising power leads to conflict.

We may yet avoid a trade war. President Xi Jinping seems eager to ease tensions, exemplified by his recent pledge to lower tariffs on imported US cars "significantly" and further open up China's financial-services sector.

One hopes the trade talks between China and the US scheduled for Thursday and Friday will silence the war drums through negotiation and mutual concessions. US and Chinese leaders could then turn their attention to the broader problem of avoiding the Thucydides' trap, thereby preventing a clash with consequences that would dwarf those of a trade war.

The author is former president of the China Society of World Economics, director of the Institute of World Economics and Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and served on the Monetary Policy Committee of the People's Bank of China from 2004 to 2006.

Project Syndicate

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本三级香港三级少妇 | 国产成人永久免费视频 | 国产精品视频免费观看调教网 | 呦视频在线一区二区三区 | 欧美日韩中文一区二区三区 | 精品国产区 | 久久综合免费视频 | 国产成人性色视频 | 手机看片1024久久精品你懂的 | 久久国产视频一区 | 高清在线亚洲精品国产二区 | 欧美俄罗斯一级毛片激情 | 中国欧美一级毛片免费 | 一及毛片 | 一区二区三区高清不卡 | 女人a级毛片 | 国产成人精品男人的天堂网站 | 美女扒开腿让男生桶爽网站 | 国产视频精品久久 | 欧美国产一区二区三区 | 黄色在线不卡 | 久久免费公开视频 | 久久久精品一区二区三区 | 久久久9999久久精品小说 | 欧美有码在线观看 | 精品欧美一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲国产国产综合一区首页 | 九九国产精品九九 | 看a网址| 中文字幕亚洲在线 | 极品美女写真菠萝蜜视频 | a毛片免费看 | 在线观看欧美亚洲日本专区 | 国产成人精品一区二三区2022 | 国产成人精品日本亚洲专 | 18视频在线观看 | 色综合天天综合网看在线影院 | 欧美精品一区二区在线观看播放 | 看欧美毛片一级毛片 | 国产在线成人一区二区 | 久久香蕉国产线看观看精品yw |