久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Judge’s blocking of US Census question praised

By KONG WENZHENG in New York | China Daily USA | Updated: 2019-01-16 23:51
Share
Share - WeChat
File Photo: Letitia James, the incoming New York Attorney General, greets a supporter while campaigning at the First Central Baptist Church in Staten Island on Oct 28, 2018. [Photo/IC]

A federal judge’s decision on Tuesday to block the Trump administration’s attempt to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census was hailed by members of Congress and supporters of immigrants.

“Today’s ruling is a win for New Yorkers and Americans across the country who believe in a fair and accurate count of the residents of our nation,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office filed and led a lawsuit on the issue. “The attempts by the Trump administration to mandate a question about citizenship were not rooted in a desire to strengthen the census process and would only undermine our immigrant communities.”

US District Judge Jesse Furman wrote in a 227-page opinion that Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced his decision of adding the question last March in a way that “concealed its true basis rather than explaining it”, and the decision, even if not unconstitutional, was “unlawful for a multitude of independent reasons and must be set aside”.

The Justice Department, which in December 2017 requested the citizenship question, argued that it would help enforce the Voting Rights Act. Ross, who oversees the census, determined in March that the question is necessary to provide a complete and accurate census block level data.

That led to multiple lawsuits by cities, states, and immigrant rights groups across the US.

Last April, 18 states, 15 cities, and various civil rights groups filed actions in New York, arguing that Ross’ decision violated the Administrative Procedure Act, which regulates federal agencies’ actions and was motivated in part “by invidious discrimination against immigrant communities of color”.

Adding the question would also lead to undercounting of immigrants in the census, claimed the plaintiffs, which might cost their Democrat-leaning communities congressional seats and some $800 billion in federal funding.

While he said that the plaintiffs didn’t prove Ross’ discriminatory intent, Furman questioned Ross and his aides’ incentives and their claim that the question was “well tested.”

The set of testimonies, records and memos related to the issue “are acts and statements of officials with something to hide”, he wrote.

While Ross initially claimed to add the question upon request of the Justice Department, the trial found out that he started the discussion on the issue more than half a year prior. The court infers that they “did have something to hide”, concluded Furman.

The Justice Department, in a statement by spokeswoman Kelly Laco, said: “Secretary Ross, the only person with legal authority over the census, reasonably decided to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census in response to the Department of Justice’s request for better citizenship data, to protect voters against racial discrimination.

“Our government is legally entitled to include a citizenship question on the census, and people in the United States have a legal obligation to answer. Reinstating the citizenship question ultimately protects the right to vote and helps ensure free and fair elections for all Americans,” the statement said.

“This ruling is a forceful rebuke of the Trump administration’s attempt to weaponize the census for an attack on immigrant communities,” said Dale Ho, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who represented the plaintiffs.

“Adding a citizenship question was a transparent and unconstitutional effort by the Trump administration to further marginalize vulnerable communities by discouraging them from participating in the census,” said Democratic Congressman Ted Lieu of California. “I’m pleased the court agreed.”

Congresswoman Grace Meng a Democrat from New York and a member of the House Appropriations Committee that funds the US Census Bureau, also hailed the decision, saying that adding the citizenship question would have a decade’s worth of consequences and “deserves to never see the light of day”.

“This was a politically motivated question against immigrant communities,” she said, adding that it would impact the distribution of federal resources and the number of congressional districts in each state.

“Inciting fear in our residents is not only immoral but also ill-conceived,” said New York Attorney General Letitia James.

The Justice Department is expected to appeal the ruling, and the case may head to the Supreme Court later this year.

“Although the Supreme Court will likely have the final say on this issue, we will continue to oppose any attempt to reinstate the citizenship question,” Meng said.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕乱码中文乱码51精品 | 最新国产毛片 | 精品午夜久久网成年网 | 狠久久| 在线免费观看一级毛片 | 伊人狠狠丁香婷婷综合色 | 国产美女一区二区在线观看 | 欧美一级毛片兔费播放 | 久久国产免费一区二区三区 | 欧美午夜影院 | 自拍三级 | 久草精品视频 | 波多野结衣一区在线 | 日韩精品一区二区三区四区 | 国产一二三区在线观看 | 香港三级日本三级人妇三级四 | 国产男女乱淫真视频全程播放 | 在线观看久草视频 | 国产精品亚洲综合 | 台湾精品视频在线播放 | 国产免费久久精品久久久 | 午夜影院a级片 | 久草网址 | 日韩一级片在线播放 | 欧美第一网站 | 色屁屁一区二区三区视频国产 | 在线观看国产一区 | 精品国产免费一区二区三区 | 久久精品在线视频 | 一级成人a毛片免费播放 | 欧美极度极度另类 | 久久91精品国产91 | 国产亚洲精品yxsp | 久久亚洲一级毛片 | 国产一区二区三区欧美精品 | 欧美a在线播放 | 97在线碰碰观看免费高清 | 久久国产热视频 | 手机在线日韩高清理论片 | 久久精品国产影库免费看 | 深夜爽爽福利gif在线观看 |