久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / World Watch

Flip-flop by UK shows cost of banning Huawei

By Tom Fowdy | China Daily Global | Updated: 2020-12-03 09:08
Share
Share - WeChat
Huawei logo pictured outside its headquarters building in Reading, Britain, July 14, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

The people of the United Kingdom are being forced to pay for their government's flip-flop on Huawei Technologies.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has abandoned his electoral manifesto pledge to "give all homes superfast broadband by 2025".

The UK government launched its spending review on Nov 25, an event triggered as an emergency due to the overwhelming economic and financial cost of COVID-19.During the event, British Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak committed over $333 million to phase out Huawei from Britain's 5G telecommunications infrastructure, adding to a ban implemented earlier this year.

However, in doing so, the government subsequently slashed its investment in telecommunications infrastructure from£5 billion ($6.68 billion) to £1.2 billion and quietly dumped Johnson's electoral pledge, which, amid pressure to ban Huawei at the start of this year, was publicly defended in a BBC interview.

The British public is now paying for Johnson's Huawei U-turn. He knew that excluding the company would narrow the UK telecommunications market, drive up infrastructure costs and, as widely warned, put Britain in the digital slow lane. Here is real evidence of that.

However, the prime minister was strong-armed into making a purely political decision based on a case without evidence by the United States and right-wing fanatics in his party. It was a bad choice.

Now, as the UK faces severe economic depletion, a record GDP decline and a record spending deficit, the government is wasting money by not upgrading its infrastructure yet removing Huawei.

Huawei matters hugely to the British economy. According to a study released by Oxford Economics business analysts, the company contributes £3.3 billion to the British GDP and 51,000 jobs. Its telecommunications equipment was the most affordable and state of the art. Not surprisingly, UK companies lobbied hard against such a ban.

Industry warnings were widespread against the consequences of excluding the Shenzhen company from Britain's 5G rollout and, most staggeringly, Johnson himself knew this.

However, the world changed. The government capitulated to a tidal wave of anti-China sentiment from within the right-wing media, Conservative Party backbenchers (who were also lobbying for Washington's line) and a US Trump administration that advocated Cold War strategies against Beijing.

As a result, the government caved in and decided to ban Huawei despite UK companies having already gone ahead with its equipment.

To do so, given that a previous security services review had already deemed it safe, and the US had never proved the "security threat", the UK government subsequently launched another security review, which claimed that US sanctions made Huawei's parts "unreliable" for network safety.

The decision was political, and the change of course, despite all the previous rhetoric, is embarrassing for Johnson. The UK had been forced into making a decision that in fact contravened its best interests and now, as the spending review shows, infrastructure and British taxpayers are footing the cost of it.

Without Huawei, the£5 billion allocated to broadband rollout in a five-year time scale is no longer sufficient. First, resources have to be allocated to replace Huawei. Second, the market is now narrower and more expensive. Therefore, the government has simply decided to cut its losses and scrap the pledge altogether.

As warned, Britain now finds itself in the "digital slow lane". Has the US offered any compensation for the decision it forced on Britain at its own expense? Are Conservative members of Parliament on the right of the party pleased that they are simultaneously burning Britain's bridges with its largest trade and investment partners while the economy shrinks by historic proportions? Are voters pleased that taxpayer money now has to be allocated to chasing out Huawei while the government freezes public sector pay?

Ultimately, one must seriously question what Britain has actually gained by making such a costly decision to exclude Huawei. The skeptic might say security, but Huawei has been in UK markets since 1998, and there is no record of "incidents". Boris Johnson's government is selling the country short on multiple fronts, and this one is yet another.

The author is a British political and international relations analyst.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产美女视频做爰 | 99国产在线 | 在线观看国产一区二区三区99 | 一区二区三区在线观看免费 | 精品国产_亚洲人成在线高清 | 国产成人精品久久 | 一级毛片一级毛片一级毛片 | 亚洲天堂免费在线视频 | 国产一区二区三区欧美精品 | 久久草在线观看 | 久久精品6 | 欧美毛片日韩一级在线 | 欧美第一页草草影院浮力 | 5级做人爱c视版免费视频 | 日韩一区二区三 | 美女久草 | 久久福利青草精品资源站免费 | 97免费视频在线观看 | 亚洲成人在线视频播放 | 免费的特黄特色大片在线观看 | 亚洲精品m在线观看 | 中国a级黄色片 | 国产精品欧美激情在线播放 | 亚洲高清自拍 | 欧美大片aaa| 黄www片 | 日本亚洲欧美在线 | 免费在线一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区视频网站 | 欧美久久久久欧美一区 | 亚洲精品成人中文网 | 欧美日韩精品一区三区 | 欧美精品xxxⅹ欧美 欧美精品不卡 | 成人一区视频 | 午夜美女影院 | 亚洲精品综合 | 国内久久精品 | 亚洲爆爽 | 99精品国产兔费观看久久99 | 男人使劲躁女人视频小v | 免费看黄网|