久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / World Watch

Flip-flop by UK shows cost of banning Huawei

By Tom Fowdy | China Daily Global | Updated: 2020-12-03 09:08
Share
Share - WeChat
Huawei logo pictured outside its headquarters building in Reading, Britain, July 14, 2020. [Photo/Agencies]

The people of the United Kingdom are being forced to pay for their government's flip-flop on Huawei Technologies.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has abandoned his electoral manifesto pledge to "give all homes superfast broadband by 2025".

The UK government launched its spending review on Nov 25, an event triggered as an emergency due to the overwhelming economic and financial cost of COVID-19.During the event, British Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak committed over $333 million to phase out Huawei from Britain's 5G telecommunications infrastructure, adding to a ban implemented earlier this year.

However, in doing so, the government subsequently slashed its investment in telecommunications infrastructure from£5 billion ($6.68 billion) to £1.2 billion and quietly dumped Johnson's electoral pledge, which, amid pressure to ban Huawei at the start of this year, was publicly defended in a BBC interview.

The British public is now paying for Johnson's Huawei U-turn. He knew that excluding the company would narrow the UK telecommunications market, drive up infrastructure costs and, as widely warned, put Britain in the digital slow lane. Here is real evidence of that.

However, the prime minister was strong-armed into making a purely political decision based on a case without evidence by the United States and right-wing fanatics in his party. It was a bad choice.

Now, as the UK faces severe economic depletion, a record GDP decline and a record spending deficit, the government is wasting money by not upgrading its infrastructure yet removing Huawei.

Huawei matters hugely to the British economy. According to a study released by Oxford Economics business analysts, the company contributes £3.3 billion to the British GDP and 51,000 jobs. Its telecommunications equipment was the most affordable and state of the art. Not surprisingly, UK companies lobbied hard against such a ban.

Industry warnings were widespread against the consequences of excluding the Shenzhen company from Britain's 5G rollout and, most staggeringly, Johnson himself knew this.

However, the world changed. The government capitulated to a tidal wave of anti-China sentiment from within the right-wing media, Conservative Party backbenchers (who were also lobbying for Washington's line) and a US Trump administration that advocated Cold War strategies against Beijing.

As a result, the government caved in and decided to ban Huawei despite UK companies having already gone ahead with its equipment.

To do so, given that a previous security services review had already deemed it safe, and the US had never proved the "security threat", the UK government subsequently launched another security review, which claimed that US sanctions made Huawei's parts "unreliable" for network safety.

The decision was political, and the change of course, despite all the previous rhetoric, is embarrassing for Johnson. The UK had been forced into making a decision that in fact contravened its best interests and now, as the spending review shows, infrastructure and British taxpayers are footing the cost of it.

Without Huawei, the£5 billion allocated to broadband rollout in a five-year time scale is no longer sufficient. First, resources have to be allocated to replace Huawei. Second, the market is now narrower and more expensive. Therefore, the government has simply decided to cut its losses and scrap the pledge altogether.

As warned, Britain now finds itself in the "digital slow lane". Has the US offered any compensation for the decision it forced on Britain at its own expense? Are Conservative members of Parliament on the right of the party pleased that they are simultaneously burning Britain's bridges with its largest trade and investment partners while the economy shrinks by historic proportions? Are voters pleased that taxpayer money now has to be allocated to chasing out Huawei while the government freezes public sector pay?

Ultimately, one must seriously question what Britain has actually gained by making such a costly decision to exclude Huawei. The skeptic might say security, but Huawei has been in UK markets since 1998, and there is no record of "incidents". Boris Johnson's government is selling the country short on multiple fronts, and this one is yet another.

The author is a British political and international relations analyst.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲欧洲久久久精品 | 深夜爽爽福利gif在线观看 | 国产成人免费高清在线观看 | 久久久久久久久免费视频 | 久久精品一区二区国产 | 亚洲欧美日韩成人一区在线 | 欧美理论片在线观看一区二区 | 国产一区二区免费视频 | 日本在线观看不卡免费视频 | 九九九国产在线 | 欧美综合另类 | 日韩 国产 欧美 精品 在线 | 国产精品久久久久国产精品三级 | 韩国porno xxxx | 久久亚洲精品成人 | 男女同床爽爽视频免费 | 久久精品视频大全 | 女人被男人躁得好爽免费视频免费 | 欧美专区一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区91 | 久久久久久久国产视频 | 日韩美女视频一区 | 亚洲精品久久久久中文字幕一区 | 99久久精品国产自免费 | 抱着cao才爽免费观看 | 日本加勒比在线播放 | 欧美日本在线一区二区三区 | 成人一级| 日本韩国一区二区三区 | 国产日本欧美亚洲精品视 | 日本黄区 | 手机在线日韩高清理论片 | 伊在人亚洲香蕉精品区 | 久久精品视频免费在线观看 | 欧美一级专区免费大片野外交 | 国产自产v一区二区三区c | 国产九九免费视频网站 | 国产成人亚洲精品影院 | 深夜福利视频网站 | 国产一区精品在线观看 | 国产1级片 |