久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Nature firms as source for open-minded experts

By MAY ZHOU in Houston | China Daily Global | Updated: 2021-07-30 09:41
Share
Share - WeChat
[Photo/Agencies]

US evolutionary biologist Michael Worobey has been firming up his opinion on the origins of the coronavirus since May, when he was among 17 scientists calling for an investigation that covered both natural source and lab-leak hypotheses.

Some two months after that appeal, published as a letter in the journal Science, the University of Arizona scientist said the newly emerging evidence has convinced him that natural origin is the more compelling explanation for the virus.

With this shift in thinking, Worobey joined 21 other scientists to publish a paper-The Origins of SARS-CoV-2: A Critical Review-in early July. "The most parsimonious explanation for the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is a zoonotic event," the scientists concluded, in referring to the name of the virus behind the pandemic. A zoonotic virus is one that crosses from animals to humans.

The authors of the review, led by Edward Holmes from the University of Sydney, are scientists from universities and research institutes in countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Austria, Australia and China.

The May letter stated that in an investigation by the World Health Organization into the origins of the virus, there were no findings in clear support of either a natural spillover or a lab accident. They thought that the two theories weren't given balanced consideration and "we must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data".

The May letter was taken as evidence by some media that the scientists were advocating lab-leak theories. That's not what they meant, according to Worobey.

"Why am I on both papers? The answer is not that I've undergone a dramatic conversion. I've always thought a zoonotic emergence was more likely than a lab leak. In light of recent evidence/thinking, I simply view it as even more likely,"Worobey wrote on Twitter recently.

Pamela Bjorkman, a biology professor who also signed the May letter, recently wrote a letter to This Week in Virology and expressed her regret in signing the May letter.

Bjorkman said she signed the letter to prompt "more funding for searching for natural viruses in animal reservoirs".

"Perhaps naively, I did not anticipate that the letter would be used to promote the lab-origin hypothesis," she said. "I now think that I should have realized this would happen and should have been more proactive-either not signed the letter at all or else requested more wording changes to make my position clear."

Second thoughts

Worobey said a couple of things moved his thinking about the origin of COVID-19.

First, Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, or WIV, and other Chinese scientists recently published a paper concerning the genomes of several bat SARS-related coronaviruses from the same mine in Yunnan province where RaTG13-closest to SARS-CoV-2-came from. He found that the genomes turned out to be less close to SARS-CoV-2.

Another recently published study also helped to move Worobey's thinking. Xiao Xiao, Chris Newman and three other scientists traced animal sales from 17 shops in Wuhan's wet markets.

The study documented "47,381 individuals from 38 species, including 31 protected species sold between May 2017 and November 2019 in Wuhan's markets", according to the paper published in Nature.

Worobey said that traded animals such as raccoon dogs and civets are "plausible intermediate hosts".

Worobey told NPR that his colleague Robert Garry, a microbiologist at Tulane University, took data from the WHO and plotted it on a map showing where people with infections lived in Wuhan.

The data model shows that early COVID-19 cases in Wuhan started near the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The map showed virtually no cases near the WIV, which is over 16 kilometers from the market.

"There are no cases around the WIV," Worobey said. "If the outbreak did start in the lab, the bottom line is, it would be odd for it not to be spreading from there rather than from elsewhere."

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产成人 | 亚洲精品99久久久久中文字幕 | 久草网首页 | 91久久精品青青草原伊人 | 一本色道久久88综合亚洲精品高清 | 三级网站国产 | 亚洲综合国产精品 | 在线一区免费视频播放 | 91久久精品国产免费一区 | 一级亚洲| 久久国产精品一区二区三区 | 在线国产二区 | 国产精品亚洲精品久久成人 | 日韩在线不卡一区在线观看 | 国产精品成人一区二区不卡 | 久草在线中文视频 | 午夜国产视频 | 日本高清色视频www 日本高清在线精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲爆爽 | 日韩欧美中文字幕一区二区三区 | 国产aⅴ一区二区三区 | 国产精品99久久99久久久看片 | 夜色视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美日韩另类在线 | 亚洲欧美日韩视频一区 | 国产美女一级特黄毛片 | 久久久久久久综合色一本 | 国产美女视频黄a视频全免费网站 | 久久久久久久久久综合情日本 | 精品欧美一区视频在线观看 | 午夜伦y4480影院中文字幕 | 国产精品莉莉欧美自在线线 | 亚洲国产精品免费观看 | 久久精品a一国产成人免费网站 | 欧美日韩综合高清一区二区 | 国产午夜亚洲精品理论片不卡 | 久久国产精品久久久 | 国产成人福利夜色影视 | 免费黄色成人 | 久草视频免费在线播放 | 怡红院老首页主页入口 |