久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

  Home>News Center>World
         
 

U.S. can use evidence gained by torture
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-12-03 20:27

Evidence gained by torture can be used by the U.S. military in deciding whether to imprison a foreigner indefinitely at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, as an enemy combatant, the government concedes.

Statements produced under torture have been inadmissible in U.S. courts for about 70 years. But the U.S. military panels reviewing the detention of 550 foreigners as enemy combatants at the U.S. naval base in Cuba are allowed to use such evidence, Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General Brian Boyle acknowledged at a U.S. District Court hearing Thursday.


The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has accused the U.S. military of using tactics 'tantamount to torture' on prisoners at the U.S. Navy base in Guantanamo Bay, The New York Times reported on November 30, 2004. An ICRC inspection team that spent most of June at Guantanamo Bay reported the use of psychological and physical coercion on the prisoners, the newspaper said. Detainees hold onto a fence at Camp 4 of the maximum security prison Camp Delta at the base Aug. 26. [Reuters]

Some of the prisoners have filed lawsuits challenging their detention without charges for up to three years so far. At the hearing, Boyle urged District Judge Richard J. Leon to throw their cases out.

Attorneys for the prisoners argued that some were held solely on evidence gained by torture, which they said violated fundamental fairness and U.S. due process standards. But Boyle argued in a similar hearing Wednesday that the detainees "have no constitutional rights enforceable in this court."

Leon asked whether a detention based solely on evidence gathered by torture would be illegal, because "torture is illegal. We all know that."

Boyle replied that if the military's combatant status review tribunals "determine that evidence of questionable provenance were reliable, nothing in the due process clause (of the Constitution) prohibits them from relying on it."


Detainees at Guantanamo Bay's Camp X-Ray. The International Committee of the Red Cross has reportedly found prisoner abuse that amounted to 'a form of torture' at the US military prison in Guantanamo Bay. [AFP]

Leon asked whether there were any restrictions on using torture-induced evidence.

Boyle replied that the United States never would adopt a policy that would have barred it from acting on evidence that could have prevented the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks even if the data came from questionable practices like torture by a foreign power.

Several arguments underlie the U.S. court ban on products of torture.

"About 70 years ago, the Supreme Court stopped the use of evidence produced by third-degree tactics largely on the theory that it was totally unreliable," Harvard Law Professor Philip B. Heymann, a former deputy U.S. attorney general, said in an interview. Subsequent high court rulings were based on revulsion at "the unfairness and brutality of it and later on the idea that confessions ought to be free and uncompelled."

Leon asked whether U.S. courts could review detentions based on evidence from torture conducted by U.S. personnel.

Boyle said torture was against U.S. policy and any allegations of it would be "forwarded through command channels for military discipline." He added, "I don't think anything remotely like torture has occurred at Guantanamo" but noted that some U.S. soldiers there had been disciplined for misconduct, including a female interrogator who removed her blouse during questioning.

The International Committee of the Red Cross said Tuesday it has given the Bush administration a confidential report critical of U.S. treatment of Guantanamo detainees. The New York Times reported the Red Cross described the psychological and physical coercion used at Guantanamo as "tantamount to torture."

The combatant status review tribunals comprise three colonels and lieutenant colonels. They were set up after the Supreme Court ruled in June that the detainees could ask U.S. courts to see to it they had a proceeding in which to challenge their detention. The panels have reviewed 440 of the prisoners so far but have released only one.

The military also set up an annual administrative review which considers whether the detainee still presents a danger to the United States but doesn't review enemy combatant status. Administrative reviews have been completed for 161.

Boyle argued these procedures are sufficient to satisfy the high court.

Noting that detainees cannot have lawyers at the combatant status review proceedings and cannot see any secret evidence against them, detainee attorney Wes Powell argued "there is no meaningful opportunity in the (proceedings) to rebut the government's claims."

Leon suggested that if federal judges start reviewing the military's evidence for holding foreign detainees there could be "practical and collateral consequences ... at a time of war."

And he suggested an earlier Supreme Court ruling might limit judges to checking only on whether detention orders were lawfully issued and review panels were legally established.

Leon and Judge Joyce Hens Green, who held a similar hearing Wednesday, said they would try to rule soon on whether the 59 detainees may proceed with their lawsuits.



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

China's mining sector sounds the alarm

 

   
 

China, EU to sign cooperative agreements

 

   
 

11 people jailed for Xi'an lottery fraud

 

   
 

China to bailout two more state banks

 

   
 

65 people missing in Guizhou landslide

 

   
 

Putin strongly opposes new Ukraine runoff

 

   
  U.S. can use evidence gained by torture
   
  30 killed in pair of major attacks in Iraq
   
  GI deserter Jenkins free to leave base
   
  Thousands mark Bhopal industrial disaster
   
  Bush names new head of homeland security
   
  World response muted to Rwanda-Congo war
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品成人久久久久久久 | 国产一区第一页 | 亚洲成人黄色片 | 农村寡妇偷毛片一级 | 午夜久久网 | 欧美色操 | 亚洲成年人专区 | 男人免费看片 | 国产一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 手机看片日韩国产一区二区 | 精品一区二区视频 | 天天看a | 久一在线 | 成人国产精品一区二区网站 | 国产欧美一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 欧美日本一二三区 | 99久久亚洲综合精品网站 | 亚洲六月丁香六月婷婷蜜芽 | 全黄a一级毛片 | 亚洲七七久久精品中文国产 | 一区二区三区欧美在线 | 欧美一级纶理片免费 | 欧美国产综合在线 | 日韩欧美久久一区二区 | 国内成人免费视频 | 成人免费观看网欧美片 | 欧美成人一区二区三区在线视频 | 日韩高清在线二区 | 香蕉福利久久福利久久香蕉 | 国产高清精品自在久久 | 国产日韩欧美三级 | 手机看a| 国产精品亚洲精品久久成人 | 九九国产精品视频 | 欧美在线观看a | 97在线公开视频 | 欧美激情久久久久久久大片 | 亚洲一区二区视频 | 国产日产欧产精品精品推荐在线 | 中文字幕亚洲一区二区三区 | 一级片免费网址 |