www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

 
  | Home | News| Living in China| MMS | SMS | About us | Contact us|
   
 Language Tips > 2001
IS AMERICA - December 3, 2001: The Supreme Court
By Jerilyn Watson

VOICE ONE:

The Supreme Court By Jerilyn WatsonThe highest court in the United States began its term in October. From now until June, it will rule on issues that affect Americans in a number of ways. I'm Shirley Griffith.



VOICE TWO:

And I'm Sarah Long. The Supreme Court is our report today on the VOA Special English program, THIS IS AMERICA.

((THEME))

VOICE ONE:

Congress created the Supreme Court of the United States more than two-hundred years ago. Over the years the court has established many legal traditions. Sometimes, however, the court surprises the nation.

For example, the Supreme Court usually lets lower courts make decisions resulting from elections. However, last December the Supreme Court made an important decision about the election for president of the United States. The court overruled the Florida Supreme Court in the case. A majority of Supreme Court justices ruled that some disputed ballots for president in Florida could not be recounted. The decision made George W. Bush the winner of the presidential election.

The Supreme Court's action angered some Americans. Some people did not think the court should have ruled in the case. Others did not think their decision was fair. But a group of newspapers recently released a report investigating a recount of the disputed ballots. Their study showed that Mister Bush almost surely would have won the election even if the disputed ballots had been recounted.



VOICE TWO:

The Supreme Court has a chief justice and eight associate justices. Their duty is to make sure federal and state laws agree with the United States Constitution. The president appoints Supreme Court justices. The Senate approves them. The justices serve for as long as they wish.

The Supreme Court has accepted more than eighty cases that they will decide this term. They include several important appeals about disabled workers. The court also will decide major cases about the death sentence.

VOICE ONE:

Seventeen states that permit punishment by death also ban execution of mentally disabled people. The federal government also bans such executions in federal cases. Last March, the Supreme Court postponed the execution of a condemned man in North Carolina. This man, Ernest Paul McCarver, was found guilty of murder. But lawyers appealed his sentence because he has very low intelligence.

The Supreme Court must decide if executing mentally disabled people is cruel and unusual punishment. The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution bans such punishment.

Another death sentence appeal involves a case in Virginia. Walter Mickens was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death. He has appealed the decision because he says his lawyer did not provide an effective defense. He says his lawyer failed to tell Mickens that he had earlier acted as a lawyer for the man Mickens killed. The Supreme Court delayed Mickens' execution when it agreed to hear the case.

The Supreme Court By Jerilyn WatsonVOICE TWO:

In Nineteen-Ninety, Congress approved a law called the Americans with Disabilities Act. The law requires employers to provide other work for employees who have become disabled on the job. This law describes a disability as an injury or condition that severely limits a person's major life activities. But lower court rulings have not made clear what a major life activity is.

Last month, the Supreme Court heard an appeal from the Toyota automobile company. The company had dismissed Ella Williams from her job at its factory in Kentucky. As part of her duties, this worker cleaned five-hundred cars each day. Over time, Mizz Williams developed hand and arm injuries. She could no longer perform her duties. An appeals court ruled that Toyota had a legal responsibility to give her a different kind of job.

Toyota, however, says it does not owe Mizz Williams a job. The company says her disability does not interfere with any of her major life activities. Now the Supreme Court must rule what a major life activity is. The court must decide what makes a person disabled.

VOICE ONE:

For each case, Supreme Court justices hear arguments by lawyers on both sides. The justices question the lawyers to get more information. They read a great deal of written information about the case. Then they discuss the case and vote. A majority of the votes of the nine justices decides what will become the law of the land. One of the justices who voted with the majority writes the opinion of the court. This opinion explains the decision made in the case.

Some justices may disagree with the majority. When that happens a justice who disagreed writes the dissenting opinion.

((MUSIC BRIDGE))

VOICE TWO:

The Supreme Court was established in Seventeen-Eighty-Nine. It was created as one of the three major divisions of the United States government. The American Constitution gave the legislative division -- the Congress -- the power to pass laws. It gave the executive division -- the president and other government agencies -- power to carry out these laws. And, it gave the judicial division -- the Supreme Court and lower courts -- the power to decide legal disputes involving these laws.

At first, this seemed to make the judicial division the weakest part of the federal government. But then, in Eighteen-Oh-Three, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the court could decide if laws already passed by Congress were constitutional. Since that time, the Supreme Court has played an important part in approving or disapproving actions taken by Congress and the president.

VOICE ONE:

Most of the cases the Supreme Court considers already have been judged in a lower court. The Supreme Court hears appeals of the decisions made by lower courts that involve federal and state laws. If the court agrees to re-examine a case, then its decision is final. It cannot be vetoed by either the president or Congress.

The president and members of Congress are elected every few years. To be re-elected, they must base their actions at least partly on what the voters want. However, Supreme Court justices are appointed for life. Their loyalty is not to voters. It is to a permanent document, the United States Constitution.

((MUSIC BRIDGE))

VOICE TWO:

At different times in American history, the Supreme Court has helped make major changes in American society. In Eighteen-Ninety-Six, for example, the Supreme Court said it was legal to have separate public places for black people and white people. The Court said this was legal as long as those places provided equally good services. That decision was used as a reason to permit racial separation in many American schools for almost sixty years.

However, in Nineteen-Fifty-Four, the Supreme Court said racial separation in American schools did violate the Constitution. It said separate schools never could be equally good schools. That decision helped end racial separation in the nation's schools. And it helped launch a major movement to gain racial equality for African Americans.

VOICE ONE:

American presidents can play an important part in changing the Supreme Court. Most presidents have the chance to appoint one or more new justices to fill the places of justices who retire or die. Presidents usually try to name justices who share their political beliefs. That means presidents may leave a mark on the court that lasts long after their own years as president have ended.

Some Supreme Courts have been conservative. President Franklin Roosevelt faced such a court when he tried to carry out economic reforms in the Nineteen-Thirties.

During the Nineteen-Fifties and Nineteen-Sixties, a very different Supreme Court developed. Chief Justice Earl Warren led this court. It made several decisions that greatly expanded the rights of accused criminals. The court also extended the right to freedom of speech and the right to freedom of religion.

VOICE TWO:

Not all Supreme Court cases result in historic decisions. But many of them do. For example, some experts believe the Court may be asked to hear cases related to a new anti-terrorism law. Congress passed the law after the attacks on the nation in September. The lower courts may test this law, which limits some traditional American rights. Experts say the Supreme Court has the responsibility for deciding all the important issues in American life.

((THEME))

VOICE ONE:

This program was written by Jerilyn Watson. It was produced by Cynthia Kirk. I'm Shirley Griffith.

VOICE TWO:

And I'm Sarah Long. Join us again next week for another report about life in the United States on the VOA Special English program, THIS IS AMERICA.

 
Go to Other Sections
Story Tools
 
Copyright by chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved

版權聲明:未經(jīng)中國日報網(wǎng)站許可,任何人不得復制本欄目內容。如需轉載請與本網(wǎng)站聯(lián)系。
None of this material may be used for any commercial or public use. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
 

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久er热这里只有精品免费 | 99j久久精品久久久久久 | 中国a级淫片免费播放 | 九九视频免费精品视频免费 | 欧美午夜网 | 国产浮力第一页草草影院 | 欧美69xx| 视频在线一区二区 | 亚洲国产精品日韩在线 | 日本高清视频www夜色资源 | 国产成人艳妇在线观看 | 521a久久九九久久精品 | 国产精品日本一区二区在线播放 | 国产精品毛片天天看片 | 九九视频在线观看视频6偷拍 | 免费观看成为人视频 | 三上悠亚免费一区二区在线 | 免费一级特黄特色黄大任片 | 热99re久久精品这里都是免费 | 国内外成人免费在线视频 | 欧美成人免费在线 | 中文国产成人精品久久一 | 亚洲成人影院在线观看 | 欧美在线小视频 | 精品国产成人综合久久小说 | 久在线观看 | 午夜日b视频 | 精品91 | 成人毛片手机版免费看 | 成人牲交一极毛片 | 久久99精品久久久久久国产越南 | 视频精品一区二区 | 一级毛片真人免费观看 | 欧洲亚洲一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区视频免费 | 精品国产免费一区二区三区五区 | 久久99久久99精品观看 | 福利视频美女国产精品 | 99久久久免费精品免费 | 杨幂国产精品福利在线观看 | 3d动漫精品成人一区二区三 |