久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

English 中文網(wǎng) 漫畫網(wǎng) 愛新聞iNews 翻譯論壇
中國網(wǎng)站品牌欄目(頻道)
當(dāng)前位置: Language Tips> 譯通四海> Columnist 專欄作家> Liu Shinan

How wide is the income gap today?

[ 2009-08-12 13:19]     字號 [] [] []  
免費(fèi)訂閱30天China Daily雙語新聞手機(jī)報:移動用戶編輯短信CD至106580009009

How wide is the income gap today?A commentary in People's Daily last week said some media outlets still take pleasure in churning out false news.

The latest example, it said, was a widely spread report that there are 3,220 people on the Chinese mainland whose personal wealth exceeded 100 million yuan ($14.6 million) each, and 2,932, or 91 percent, of them are children of high-ranking officials. "This is an out and out false news," the commentary said, citing some authoritative institutions that were rumored to be the source of the news.

The commentary analyzed the reason why false news could still be spread after so many cases had been revealed and denounced. It said false news generally suits readers' and viewers' "consumption needs". Meeting these needs can "bring huge commercial benefits" to the media, it said.

Two questions arose in my mind after I read the commentary. First, why does the above news "suit the readers' and viewers' consumption needs?" Second, where can they get true information on the subject?

The public is concerned over reports of rich people's income because it resents that a Shanxi coalmine boss bought 100 million yuan ($14.7 million) worth of villas in Beijing in the first half of this year while a blue-collar worker in the city needs to work and save for 90 years to be able to buy a second-hand 70-sq-m apartment. The public also resents the fact that the general manager of State-owned Sinopec squandered 40,000 yuan ($5,882) a day on banquets while a man in the countryside committed suicide because he couldn't pay 4,800 yuan a year to help his son realize his dream of studying in a university. All these incidents have been reported by the Chinese media.

How wide is the income gap today?

The income gap between the rich and the poor is apparently huge. But there has never been specific data on how large the gaps are between different social strata. Look for the facts on any search engine on the Internet and you will find different versions of the Gini coefficient in China. The only seemingly reliable version is the index the National Bureau of Statistics published in 2004, which was 0.47, well above the internationally acknowledged alarming level of 0.4.

Now, after five years, nobody knows how bigger or smaller the coefficient has grown. But the general impression is that the rich-poor income gap is wider than five years ago. That shows why people are agitated when they come across data on distribution of social wealth in the media. None of these media reports seem reliable, yet, for they often contradict each other and there's no authoritative source to confirm them.

One could ask: "Why do the competent authorities not publish official data on how social wealth is distributed among society's members?" Or, we could ask: "Did they ever study the problem?"

Finding the truth may be a difficult task because many big money earners tend to hide their wealth. But I don't think the task is difficult enough for the authorities to carry out. Nowadays, when common netizens can dig out detailed information on any person they are interested in through renrou shouso (or "human flesh search") why are official statistical institutions unable to get data on the distribution of social wealth?

The author of the commentary published in People's Daily ended his criticism of some irresponsible media outlets by saying: "They may be saving the trouble of checking the facts and promote sensation and commercial benefits, but they will lose their authenticity and credibility." I would like to use some of his words to conclude my column: "The statistical authorities can save the trouble of doing a difficult task, but by doing so they will lose their authenticity and credibility."

E-mail: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn

About the author:

劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業(yè)于武漢華中師范學(xué)院(現(xiàn)華中師范大學(xué))英文系。1982年畢業(yè)于北京體育學(xué)院(現(xiàn)北京體育大學(xué))研究生院體育情報專業(yè)。1982年進(jìn)入中國日報社,先后擔(dān)任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責(zé)任編輯、發(fā)稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業(yè)周刊》總編輯等職。現(xiàn)任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務(wù)院“特殊貢獻(xiàn)專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協(xié)會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

相關(guān)閱讀:

No leniency for violators of traffic law

How to make a clean sweep of waste handling

Teachers in rural areas

Accident law leaves a lot to be desired

 

 
中國日報網(wǎng)英語點(diǎn)津版權(quán)說明:凡注明來源為“中國日報網(wǎng)英語點(diǎn)津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國日報網(wǎng)簽署英語點(diǎn)津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:XXX(非英語點(diǎn)津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請與稿件來源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問題與本網(wǎng)無關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學(xué)習(xí)與研究,如果侵權(quán),請?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
 

關(guān)注和訂閱

人氣排行

翻譯服務(wù)

中國日報網(wǎng)翻譯工作室

我們提供:媒體、文化、財經(jīng)法律等專業(yè)領(lǐng)域的中英互譯服務(wù)
電話:010-84883468
郵件:translate@chinadaily.com.cn
 
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久国产精品免费视频 | 亚洲国产精品久久人人爱 | 看全色黄大色黄大片毛片 | 亚洲国产精品大秀在线播放 | 狠狠色综合久久婷婷 | 亚洲一区免费在线观看 | 一级做a爰片久久毛片美女 一级做a爰片久久毛片免费看 | 一个人免费看的www 一及 片日本 | 日本特黄特色视频 | 免费一级美国片在线观看 | 手机在线免费毛片 | 91九色偷拍| 美女一级片视频 | 99久久亚洲综合精品网站 | 欧美黑粗特黄午夜大片 | 国产精品_国产精品_国产精品 | 亚洲一区二区三区四区在线 | 国产成人高清亚洲一区久久 | 92国产福利久久青青草原 | 成网站在线观看人免费 | 美女扒开腿让男人桶个爽 | 日韩欧美一区二区精品久久 | 手机在线黄色 | 久久久欧美综合久久久久 | 国产精品久久国产精品99 | 亚洲视频国产视频 | 能在线观看的一区二区三区 | 国产一区二区在线看 | 国产精品制服 | 亚洲经典在线观看 | 岛国大片在线播放免费 | 全部免费国产潢色一级 | 亚州视频一区二区 | 国产欧美亚洲三区久在线观看 | 亚洲一区浅井舞香在线播放 | 精品国产免费第一区二区三区日韩 | 国产在线高清不卡免费播放 | 日本一极毛片兔费看 | 国产亚洲视频在线播放大全 | 一本到不卡 | 91欧美一区二区三区综合在线 |