www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

   
 
Preventing a patent authorization
( )

Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications? A: Yes. The Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law Rule 48 goes, “Any person may, from the date of publication of an application for a patent for invention till the date of announcing the grant of the patent right, submit to the Patent Administration Department under the State Council his observations, with reasons therefore, on the application which is not in conformity with the provisions of the Patent Law.” I suggest your company drafts a copy of public opinions, marking out the specific application number and putting the substantial defects in detail with authentic evidence and reasons, such as comparative documents and relevant reasoning that may effectively destroy the patent’s novelty and originality. This public opinion then should be handed to the Hearing Department of SIPO Patent Bureau so that the substantive examiner would refer to the document and possibly stop the authorization should they approve the opinion.

(Answered by Ye Wandong, Beijing Erhai Intellectual Property Agent)

Citating other documents in the application

Applicants handed patent application A and B to the patent bureau. Application A cited the specification of the patent’s raw materials from Application B, rather than directly recording the formula. Will citation of this kind lead to insufficient publicity of Application A? A: Guidelines for Examination (PartII Chapter 2) 2.2.3 rules that citations shall comply with the following requirements: “For non-patent documents and foreign patent documents, the publication date shall be earlier than the filing date of the application; for Chinese patent documents, the publication date shall be no later than the publication date of the application.” As for this case, if the publication date of Application B is no later than that of Application A, no problem would be there regarding citations in Application A, otherwise Application A would be seen as not having recorded information abstracted from Application B, which may causes insufficient publication. What worth mentioning is that the delay of publication of Application B may still occur out of some rare causes even if the two applications were filed on the same day. To avoid such risk, applicants are better advised to completely record the whole technical programs.

(Answered by Ye Wandong, Beijing Erhai Intellectual Property Agent)

Double-patenting

Two patent applications were filed respectively for utility model and innovation for the same innovation on the same day. The innovation had been authorized a patent of utility model before, which is expired now. According to the Patent Law Article 9, will it possible for the innovation to be granted patent of innovation? A: The modification of Article 9 in the third amendment of the Patent Law aims to prevent the concurrence of two patent rights for one innovation, as well as a double-patenting to an innovation whose patent has expired. However, an exceptional clause for auxiliary conditions remains in the third amendment of the Patent Law Article 9. In case that a same person applying simultaneously for patent of utility model and patent of innovation for a same creation, the authorization of a patent of innovation can only be acquired by abdicating the creation’s existing patent of utility model, which means a patent of utility model unexpired for the creation must exist. This is because it is a custom to apply for the patent of innovation and the patent of utility model for the same creation on the same day. The practice has brought great convenience to the applicants and there is still a huge need for this unique way of application. When it comes to the above-mentioned case, the patent of utility model has already expired, making it impossible to apply for a patent of innovation.

(Answered by Yi Jiling, examinant of the Patent Bureau, SIPO)



The J-Innovation

Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

The future of China & WTO

JETRO: A decade of development in China

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 女人张开腿让男人捅视频 | 国产成人免费网站 | 国产成人精品视频一区 | 失禁h啪肉尿出来高h男男 | 久久国产精品久久久久久久久久 | 日本午夜精品 | 九九精品视频在线观看 | 欧美一级毛片俄罗斯 | 在线欧美色 | 欧美三级欧美成人高清www | 欧美俄罗斯一级毛片 | 日本成a人片在线观看网址 日本成年人视频网站 | 欧美巨大另类极品videohd | 高清性色生活片欧美在线 | 久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品专区一区二区欧美 | 欧美成人四级hd版 | 欧美视频一区在线观看 | 欧美国产精品亚洲精品第一区 | 在线a国产 | 久久久久久综合成人精品 | 草久在线播放 | 日韩字幕一中文在线综合 | 国产成人亚洲合集青青草原精品 | 99视频九九精品视频在线观看 | 久久久久琪琪精品色 | 国产成人精品久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产综合精品 | 成人免费影视网站 | 日韩一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 欧美一级录像 | 国产孕妇做受视频在线观看 | 全部免费毛片在线 | 久久性久久性久久久爽 | 日本一区二区在线 | 亚洲欧美色视频 | 精品亚洲一区二区 | 香蕉三级 | 男人女人做性全程视视频 | 亚洲一区二区中文 | 成人a级高清视频在线观看 成人a毛片 |