www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Manila has no locus standi in sea case

By Zhou Jiang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-11 07:35

A Foreign Ministry document on the Philippines' move to take the South China Sea dispute to an international tribunal for arbitration reiterates that China will not accept, let alone participate, in such kind of adjudication. The document, issued on Sunday, explains why the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the dispute.

Aside from the greater issues Manila's arbitration request involves, the "mandatory arbitration" it is seeking before fulfilling some prior procedural obligations is also an important reason why the tribunal should not take up the case. According to Article 288 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, whether or not a court or tribunal has jurisdiction over any dispute between parties depends on whether the dispute is submitted in accordance with part XV of the Convention. And Article 286 also says that any dispute on the interpretation or application of the Convention shall, where no settlement has been reached by recourse to section 1, be submitted at the request of any party to the dispute to the court or tribunal having jurisdiction under this section.

A study of the relevant clauses of the document shows Manila has not fulfilled the obligations of "settling the dispute by peaceful means" and "exchanging views with other parties to the dispute" before taking the dispute to the tribunal.

According to Article 279 of the Convention and Clause 33 of the UN Charter, peaceful means to resolve the dispute include talks, investigations, mediation, arbitration, judicial settlement and other peaceful means agreed to by the disputing parties. But despite the inclusion of "arbitration", the Article excludes "mandatory arbitration", which Manila seeks.

Article 279 states only sketchily that parties should settle a dispute on the interpretation and/or application of the Convention through peaceful means in accordance with relevant international documents, and Article 298 and other articles present supplementary statements on matters such as how to choose peaceful means. For example, Articles 280 and 281 encourage relevant parties to resolve their disputes peacefully through the negotiation means they agree to.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
Considering money as the end is the tragedy
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产成人在人网站天堂 | 欧美三级在线视频 | 精品一区二区三区的国产在线观看 | 亚洲精品视频在线 | 男人躁女人躁的好爽免费视频 | 成人精品一区二区久久久 | 波多野结衣中文一区二区免费 | 日韩一级免费视频 | 99ri在线视频 | 91网站在线免费观看 | 国产福利不卡一区二区三区 | 性色综合| 国内精自线一二区 | 亚洲成人高清在线 | 97人摸人人澡人人人超一碰 | 日本手机在线视频 | 在线亚州 | 亚洲美女在线观看 | 男人扒开双腿女人爽视频免费 | 欧美一级高清片欧美国产欧美 | 欧美亚洲国产精品久久久 | 日韩中文字幕免费观看 | 国产一区二区在线视频 | 成人精品区 | 美女张开腿 | 久久亚洲私人国产精品 | 免费看a级 | 在线免费精品视频 | 国产日韩一区二区三区在线播放 | 第一色网站 | 一级特黄牲大片免费视频 | 一级做a爰片性色毛片小说 一级做a爰片性色毛片中国 | 欧美h版成版在线观看 | 老司机精品福利视频 | 一级做a爱过程免费观看 | 国产菲菲视频在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清 | 成人毛片免费免费 | 国产三级一区二区 | 手机在线看片福利 | 高清在线观看自拍视频 |