www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Reporter's Journal

A violent week in the US made more graphic by unfiltered media

By Chang Jun | China Daily USA | Updated: 2016-07-12 10:50
Share
Share - WeChat

Bloodshed in the US made for some terribly sad headlines last week. A streaming video on Facebook showed a police officer fatally shoot a black man in Minnesota, sparking national outrage and claims of racial injustice, followed a day later by the killing of five police officers in Dallas by a lone sniper who vowed revenge on white people.

Philando Castile's death also was preceded on July 5 by the fatal shooting of another black man, Alton Sterling, by police in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

"Too many shootings and hatred on the media, no matter if they are traditional or new media," complained a friend of mine. "I'm so fed up with the information bombarding nowadays."

As a journalist who was taught on the first days about gatekeeping and agenda-setting theories, and about media ethics and professionalism, I can't help but wonder what has gone wrong with media today.

In the digital era when anyone can claim to be a "journalist", who should be in charge of news selection and decide what should be told to the public?

First instituted by German-American social psychologist Kurt Lewin in 1943, the gatekeeping theory has provided a solid foundation for traditional media practice and editorial operations worldwide.

Irrespective of social systems and ideology, gatekeeping requires a media practitioner to abide by social and human ethics and safeguard the public's right to know the "right things".

According to scholars Pamela Shoemaker and Tim Vos in the field, gatekeeping is the "process of culling and crafting countless bits of information into the limited number of messages that reach people every day, and it is the center of the media's role in modern public life. This process determines not only which information is selected, but also what the content and nature of the messages, such as news, will be."

At traditional media outlets, reporters usually decide which sources are included in a story, and editors decide what gets published.

Technology and innovation make instant communication a click of a mouse away. Although individuals are expected to act as gatekeepers by filtering information before disseminating it through an e-mail, blog or video, is it asking too much for each social media user to play a more responsible role in producing and distributing content through sites such as Twitter and Facebook?

Consider the video that captured the last moments of the life of Philando Castile, 32, who died when he was shot by an officer in his car on July 6 in Falcon Heights, Minnesota.

When stopped by a police officer for a registration check, Castile told the officer in his car that he had a pistol that he was licensed to carry, and instead of sitting quietly without moving, he "tried to get his wallet out". The officer then shot him numerous times.

In the five-minute video, a woman sitting next to Castile filmed the last minutes of his life. Blood soaked through his shirt, and he seemed to be suffocating.

The policeman, shaking and sobbing in the background, can be heard saying, "I told him not to reach for it. I told him to get his hand out."

The video has caused a widespread reaction, from the president down to the streets in many cities of the US and around the world. However, the damage can be stemmed if society can reach a consensus and move toward establishing a gatekeeping system.

We can't rely on Facebook for information-filtering. We can't expect Mark Zuckerberg to acquire journalism credentials. However, each of us can at least decide what we want to post and to whom we want the information to reach.

Contact the writer at junechang@chinadailyusa.com

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产福利在线91 | 波多野结衣一级 | 国产午夜精品久久理论片 | 国产一及片 | 亚洲网在线观看 | 国产jk福利视频在线观看 | 日本黄页网站在线观看 | 一级女性生活片 | 亚洲精品成人网久久久久久 | 日本亚洲欧美国产日韩ay高清 | 日韩在线视频免费 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品午夜一区 | 天堂男人2021av | se94se欧美| 亚欧在线观看 | 久草在线新视频 | 亚洲综合成人在线 | 九九热视频在线播放 | 久久精品成人免费看 | www.99精品| 免费在线观看a级片 | 午夜啪啪福利视频 | 97精品国产综合久久久久久欧美 | 国产一级做a爰片在线看免费 | 欧美一级特黄aaaaaa在线看首页 | a级片在线| 欧美日韩视频在线第一区二区三区 | 精品国产91久久久久久久 | 国产亚洲精品yxsp | 久久r视频 | 国产欧美17694免费观看视频 | 国产亚洲一欧美一区二区三区 | 亚洲综合亚洲 | 日韩欧美毛片免费看播放 | 国产成人毛片精品不卡在线 | 日本一区二区三区高清福利视频 | 72种姿势欧美久久久久大黄蕉 | 日本一在线中文字幕天堂 | 日韩一区二区久久久久久 | 亚洲欧美精品一区二区 |