www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Zhou Shuchun

Will 'crisis' of humanities obscure future of liberal arts?

By Zhou Shuchun | China Daily | Updated: 2025-06-10 15:14
Share
Share - WeChat
LU PING/CHINA DAILY

The satirical essay, The Battle of the Books, by Jonathan Swift, the author of Gulliver's Travels, has once again become a buzzword, just as it has periodically over the past 300 years, serving as shorthand for debates on the value of classical or humanities education.

This time, the backdrop is a near-global retreat of the humanities. Harvard College reportedly canceled 30 courses, many of them in the liberal arts, in 2024. The University of Kent in the United Kingdom, announced the phasing out of six disciplines, including art history, anthropology and philosophy. In China, a top-tier university reduced its traditional liberal arts enrollment from 30 percent to 20 percent.

As the rhetoric of "the uselessness of liberal arts" resurfaces, another leading Chinese university made the Harvard event part of a graduate school entrance exam, requiring candidates to write about the concerns over the decline of the humanities. This gave liberal arts an opportunity to defend or counterattack, while also, in a strikingly memorable way, highlighting the awkward predicament facing the humanities.

The immediate cause of downsizing in liberal arts is dwindling enrollment. GenZ appears inclined to seek stable career returns, and at present, the humanities are struggling to provide such professional assurances. Global data show that liberal arts graduates have lower employment rates and starting salaries compared with their STEM counterparts. In the United States, the three majors with the highest unemployment rates are reportedly art history, liberal arts and fine arts, while underemployment rates for history, English, mass media and sociology hover around 50 percent.

As for why such a situation has arisen, one could blame a dual impact. On the one hand, there's the blow of a poor economy. Historically, the humanities have cyclically faced crises in both Europe and the US. When a recession hits, humanities courses, since they have less tangible economic returns, are the first to be cut. On the other hand, information and telecommunications technology, which has structurally transformed industries and education, has had a more direct impact on the humanities. Jobs in advertising, publishing and other fields closely tied to traditional liberal arts are shrinking. And declining birth rates are directly affecting education-related disciplines.

If employability challenges are an indisputable fact, the notion that "liberal arts are useless" is fundamentally unacceptable. In reality, the fields of STEM also face displacement pressure from new technologies, yet they rarely need to justify their existence. When certain STEM disciplines lose relevance, their obsolescence is swift and uncontested.

The potential usefulness or intrinsic worth of the humanities is often framed as a question of justice. As Paul Reitter and Chad Wellmon argue in Permanent Crisis: The Humanities in a Disenchanted Age, the humanities have been in crisis throughout modern history because they position their value in opposition to the material metrics of industrial society.

Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi's concept of "the usefulness of the useless" is frequently cited in defense of the humanities: A lush tree, deemed unfit for lumber, escapes the axe and grows into a towering giant. Zhuangzi's parable in Free and Easy Wandering offers a dialectical perspective, while Jonathan Swift's The Battle of the Books presents a more binary opposition: The bee symbolizes classicists, drawing nourishment from flowers, while the spider represents the utilitarian mindset of moderns, confined to a narrow worldview.

Of course, such metaphors feel disconnected from contemporary reality, and the humanities cannot rely on narcissistic self-justification. The question is not whether the humanities have value, but how. Even those who trumpet "the uselessness of liberal arts" don't truly believe the humanities will vanish.

As a Chinese saying goes, "Had Heaven not sent forth Confucius, eternity would have been without a dawn." Globally, the Axial Age of rational reflection, marked by figures like Confucius and Aristotle, ushered in a new era of human civilization. The systematic knowledge humanity later developed in geometry, astronomy, politics and ethics can all be traced back to that axial origin.

The logic holds in today's more materialistic world. A survey of more than 300 companies found that 93 percent of employers consider critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving skills more important than a candidate's undergraduate major. As a renowned university president put it, "The knowledge we learn today will be obsolete in a decade. What matters most is learning how to learn." The world might not need more programmers, but jobs involving human interaction will grow.

Nevertheless, reform in the humanities is imperative. A consensus has been formed on adjusting curriculums, merging overly niched disciplines, and fostering interdisciplinary integration to create a broader, more socially relevant macro-liberal arts or new humanities. At the same time, excessive quantification and empiricism in research and teaching should be avoided to realign with the humanities' core mission.

The rise of STEM is not a bad thing, for it signals leaps in societal productivity. Similarly, the contraction of the humanities is not a death sentence but an opportunity for supply-side transformation. In China, the push to build an independent knowledge system has further energized the humanities. As the Chinese university reforming its humanities program said, "In a mature society, liberal arts matter more."

The author is chief researcher at the China Watch Institute, China Daily. The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 失禁h啪肉尿出来高h健身房 | 日韩欧美亚洲综合久久99e | 日韩精品一区二区三区在线观看l | 毛片96视频免费观看 | 久草视频福利在线 | 亚洲自拍中文 | 91精品国产乱码久久久久久 | 免费一级毛片在线播放欧美 | 亚洲福利国产精品17p | 亚洲精品一区二区三区在线播放 | 99精品在线观看 | 成人在线观看一区 | 国产高清精品自在线看 | av成人天堂| 插美女网站 | 亚洲国产精品热久久2022 | 国产三级日产三级日本三级 | 91久久精品国产免费一区 | 欧美另类亚洲一区二区 | 欧美第一页草草影院浮力 | 久久亚洲综合 | 久久国产欧美日韩高清专区 | 久久只有这才是精品99 | 亚洲精品综合欧美一区二区三区 | 中文字幕有码在线观看 | 韩国精品一区视频在线播放 | 大片刺激免费播放视频 | 欧美一级毛片一免费 | 国内免费自拍视频 | 久久久久欧美情爱精品 | 久久久久日韩精品无 | 99精品国产一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品午夜高清影院 | 男女午夜爱爱久久无遮挡 | 欧美精品成人 | 亚洲欧美日韩在线一区二区三区 | 国产一级片大全 | 精品成人在线 | 台湾香港澳门三级在线 | 自拍偷在线精品自拍偷无码专区 | 男人又粗又硬桶女人免费 |