www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

   
 
An IP best-seller published 12 years late
(China IP)
Updated: 2010-04-25

China IP: Looking back at the negotiations, do you think there are any points not well considered?

Wu: Yes. The Copenhagen Climate Conference held in December gives us a good example of the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities”. For example, the responsibility of climate protection is shared by countries in the world, but is differentiated between developed countries and developing countries. So are IP negotiations. IP protection is a common task for all countries, but in different countries the protection can be at different levels. China started IP legislation in 1979. Developed countries spent several hundred years in developing IP legislation, but we only consumed less than two decades. With regards to IP law enforcement, the Chinese government has also made great efforts and taken many effective measures. Therefore, I think the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities” should have been applied to the IP negotiations.

China IP: You have described many people in your book. Who leaves you with the deepest impression?

Wu: Everyone left me with a deep and distinctive impression. I gave the most pages to Wu Yi because she stood for our country’s standpoint and image. I also liked Tong Zhiguang very much. He had such a strong personality. I’m sure his big tobacco pipe must have left deep a impression on readers. I also used many words describing Duan Ruichun, who had been in the IP negotiations with the United States in the area of science and technology before the promulgation of the Special 301 Provisions. Duan was very handsome, courteous, and represented China’s image. He knew how to liven up the negotiations and to compass his purpose in a smart way. Another vivid description is Zhang Yuejiao. She attended most negotiations and did the most concrete work. She was both a MOFTEC expert and a jurist, and had insightful views of intellectual property.

China IP: There are many women negotiators in your book. Did you pay special attention to them?

Wu: This was indeed a coincidence and I did pay special attention to them. When I was writing the book, I found that the negotiations were really a little bit “feminine”. We have Wu Yi, and they have Carla A. Hills and Charlene Barshefsky. Although Lee Sands was male, he had a very important women assistant: Deborah Lehr. Another woman was the American chief representative, who was mainly talking with Long Yongtu in Geneva about China’s GATT resumption. Maybe readers will wonder why there are so many women negotiators. I think women were more affecting and impressive. They could move others with their tears. Lehr even took out her family album and introduced her kids and nanny to Chinese representatives; partially a show, and partially an outpouring of her true feelings.

China IP: Every negotiation portrayed by you is very interesting, but did you feel bored during the negotiations?

Wu: Not at all (Smile). Of course, different people had different feelings. Some negotiators had been in this area of work for many years and certainly they were easily bored. I wrote in my book that Dong Baolin was even reluctant to enter the negotiations room and American negotiators were so eager to go home at Christmas that they were singing in the hall of the MOFTEC. You can see they were all fed up with the negotiations. But I cherished that experience very much. Everything was fresh to me and I could not endure missing any detail of the negotiations. Then I observed it and analyzed it with a journalist’s eye, without any pressure on me. What I recorded is accurate and objective. It is a true mirror of history. Another point is that if the negotiations were really boring, I would use vivid descriptions to attract more readers. After all, who will read a boring book that records boring things?

China IP: In your view, which part of the negotiations stands out as a highlight?

Wu: I think the most wonderful negotiations were between Wu Yi and Hills, and between Tong Zhiguang and Hills. In my eyes, Hills was an “iron lady”. She was considered an impassable barrier in international negotiations and had “defeated” many opponents. Chinese negotiators also considered her a “hard bone”; a big trial. Another highlight was the Chinese side’s big fight back led by Wu Yi during her second attendance.

China IP: What is the nature of IP negotiations, in your view?

Wu: National interest, definitely. National interest is not a virtual thing, but substantive, and can be accurate to decimal points. When a negotiator sat before the negotiation table, he was stripped of all personal interests and became a representative of his country. He must clearly know how to play the cards!

China IP: Do you feel that the Sino-U.S. IP negotiations have promoted IP development in China?

Wu: Surely! Intellectual property in China is in essence an innate need of the country’s domestic development and opening up. However, if it were not for international negotiations, intellectual property in China could never have achieved such fast development. In other words, it is the international negotiations that urge us to develop intellectual property. The promulgation of China’s Copyright Law and Patent Law is, to a certain degree, driven by the Sino-U.S. IP negotiations.

China IP: As a witness of China’s IP development over the past 12 years, what changes do you think have taken place?

Wu: Great changes have taken place. Several major laws have been amended and law enforcement has been strengthened. Moreover, I think people have raised copyright awareness. 20 year ago, it was the time of “collective unconsciousness of copyright” and piracy was everywhere. But now it’s the era of the awakening of people’s IP protection consciousness, which, in my opinion, is very important. Without the awakening of people’s IP protection consciousness, IP protection would be empty talk no matter how comprehensive or rigorous the legislation is.

But there are still many problems, such as the irreconcilable conflict between scientific and technological development and IP protection.

One last thing that I want to say is that this book has also been pirated. Imagine one day when China and the U.S. come back to negotiations again and an American representative is holding a pirated copy of Rivalry Between the Powers in his hand, what an ironic moment that would be!

By Zhou Yi, China IP

(Translated by Hu Xiaoying)


   Previous Page 1 2 3 Next Page  


Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

Can an expired patent be applied again?

What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天综合色一区二区三区 | 国产精品亚洲欧美一级久久精品 | 欧美成人一区二区三区在线视频 | 一级一片免费看 | 国产欧美一区二区三区观看 | 久久九九精品视频 | 九一国产 | 成人免费的性色视频 | 国产精品视频免费一区二区三区 | 国产热久久精 | 国产精品偷伦费观看 | 久久凹凸 | 国产精品视频久久久久久 | 成年人三级网站 | 狠狠综合久久 | 亚洲精品亚洲人成人网 | 久久久精品一区 | 加勒比一区二区 | 成人a级高清视频在线观看 成人a毛片 | 亚洲国产欧美在线不卡中文 | 亚洲成人高清在线观看 | 精品在线免费观看 | 成人性色生活片全黄 | 国产在线精品福利一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美视频一区二区 | 国产免费午夜a无码v视频 | 国产精品亚洲精品日韩已方 | 免费特黄视频 | 2020国产精品 | 97超级碰碰碰久久久观看 | 毛片天堂 | 伊人色综合久久天天人手人停 | 中文字幕亚洲一区二区va在线 | 2022国内精品免费福利视频 | 久久在线视频免费观看 | 国产手机精品a | 亚洲精品一区二区三区第四页 | 亚洲国产精品线观看不卡 | 二区三区在线 | 国产不卡在线观看视频 | 亚州三级视频 |